I was all set yesterday to compose a chirpy and exultant post, declaring to all the world the supremacy of Kirk Olsen among all men, and his girlfriend Zula among all women. They took a ride back to Hamid’s ger camp this past weekend. On the way, they stopped at an ovoo on the high pass where we stopped on our trip. Thoughtful Zola said to her little nephew, “Look around and see if you find a mala here.” The nephew apparently looked down and said, “What, like this one?” snatching up the beloved mala of yours truly. It’s hanging back around my neck now.
I had a whole riff on this worked out, full of joy, flattery, satisfaction and, of course, jokes. But I made the mistake of clicking around the ‘net first, subject Lebanon.
In rapid succession, I read James Wolcott giving voice to his most full-throated moral outrage with an eloquence few can similarly muster:
"The war crimes of the United States," he begins, "compound by the minute, the hour, the day. I predict that George Bush, upon leaving office, will be the most despised president in American history. He will have his core support, the clotted, stunted brains that collect at sites like Lucianne.com and Powerline, but he will enjoy no Reaganesque orange sunset afterglow (or Nixonian self-rehabilitation), so deep, lasting, and tragic is the damage he's done, a damage abetted by a craven, corrupt political class and a press that even now, as the full dimensions of the disaster unfold before us, is unable to sound alarm, so accustomed as they've become to their role as sponges and clever snots. History will not forgive Bush or the United States, nor should it, for raising and destroying the hopes of the Iraqi people, and presiding over the dissolution of their nation into a failed state...
"...But it is not enough to blame Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Blair, Lieberman, the neocons, the liberal hawks, and other useless idiots. By our actions in Iraq, and our complicity and collaboration with the Israeli assault on Lebanon, American citizens are culpable for letting 9/11 turn them/us into passive accomplices."
This led to Robert Fisk’s agonized elegy for a country that has been his beloved home for so long. And, finally, this searing cry from a Beirut reporter just identified as Hanady (scroll down and be warned: many extremely graphic photos of civilian bombing casualties; this is what constitutes George “Stem Cell Veto” Bush’s “moment of clarity” resulting in profound inaction), echoing many reports that Israel is bombarding Lebanese civilians with phosphorous incendiary weapons.
I simply went catatonic, all day. I mean, I was distressed at Hamid’s camp when I killed a couple of mosquitoes. What I was reading and seeing, even as Iraq simultaneously descends into Rwanda-like daily massacre, was beyond comprehension. I recalled an episode from my childhood I hadn’t thought of in a long time. I was in maybe the 6th or 7th grade when the big school bully attacked one of the hopeless nebbishes on the playground. The kid had no defense and was quickly knocked down and overpowered. The bully kept punching the kid in the face, at will, over and over. I was appalled and upset, and asked my friend Jimmy why he was doing that. Jimmy replied, “That’s what’s called ‘beating the shit out of him,’” as though it were perfectly normal. I knew in my heart it wasn’t. It was animal. And I felt my own cowardice as I feared what I should have done – tackle the bully at all costs, just to relieve the poor helpless kid and restore some sanity. I also understood the cowardice of the bully. The grown-ups intervened soon enough, but I could have, and should have, acted sooner.
I would rather I never again heard the word “religion” attached to such acts of immoral slaughter, either to those who perpetrate them or those who condone them. The Dalai Lama redacts the spiritual path in this way so that even the most simple-minded among us can understand it: “If you can help others, do so. If you can’t, at least don’t harm them.” The very least you can do is do no harm. The least. In light of all this Bush and his enablers’ pieties about embryonic stem cells make me want to vomit.
Intermission: This Kung Fu Monkey story is amazing and perfect.
What to do? Mongolia is at peace, and some of its people are inclined to want to live a genuine spiritual life. I’ll endeavor here as I can, to try to share what the Buddha discovered 2600 years ago and himself shared from his fully enlightened perspective. Suffering occurs due to negative actions committed in ignorance. These actions, and the subsequent suffering, will persist as long as ignorance persists. Ignorance is firmly rooted in ego-clinging, by which the Buddha meant clinging to a concept of ego where, upon examination, no such thing exists or has ever existed. Can you imagine? The actions which guarantee our future suffering (i.e. inflicting suffering on others, or ignoring their suffering when one has the power to help) are driven by an illusion. Once one penetrates beyond this filmy illusion all apparent reality is perfect equality. There’s no basis for clinging to labels like “American,” “terrorist,” “Hezbollah,” “Israeli,” “Shiite,” “Sunni,” “native,” “immigrant,” you name it. Whatever label is created so one can then smugly define and regard “other” with suspicion, hatred, and “just wars.”
The more one understands the truth that the concepts with which we create these catastrophes are simply empty – in fact not even empty; there’s never been anything there to truly call “empty” or “real” – the more one would no more kick a dog or step on an ant than stab oneself in the heart.
People who spend their lives cultivating this understanding, and letting their beings saturate with the natural compassion which follows? This is how it looks when we’re together, I swear:
Wow! You got your mala back, amazing!
Posted by: Yeshe | July 25, 2006 at 08:30 AM
I feel your pain, truly. It's been emotional melt down for me all week. Particularly as I count the near East my second home and am loathe to see it ripped to pieces. It's like a bad magic trick, while all eyes are focused on Condi's carefully casual new hairdo, the other hand is slipping a new supply of missiles to Israel. With which they can bomb the Americans who haven't gotten out of Beiruit? As my son says, what the f*ck-ever.
The only sanity I can find out of this is to motivate my practice full on. I've discovered that the funny smelling Mongolian manuscript I bought on ebay last year is in fact a commentary on the Diamond Sutra. The very bit of dharma I wanted to work on next. So I'll pray for compassion for a world that needs it, and stick to my studies, and hope for the best.
Glad to hear about your mala. Very very typical Mongolian story, at least in my experience!
Posted by: Carol | July 25, 2006 at 09:38 AM
hi - I'm a lurker here and have been reading you for a little wail. I just want to say I love the blog and I almost fell out of my chair to hear that you found your mala. I felt so sad that you had lost that. I have started to sit and I 'm learning about attachment, and dharma - wow was that a tough test for you. So glad you have it back.keep writing!jill
Posted by: Jill | July 25, 2006 at 05:46 PM
I am an Mongolian. It was enjoying to read your post
You know Mongolians are quite happy with Mr Bush. George.W. Bush will be remembered as good US president who visited Mongolia, first from USA
Batu
Posted by: Batu | July 25, 2006 at 07:13 PM
Jill -- I love it when people de-lurk! Welcome!
Honestly, if losing a mala is the biggest challenge I face...I was bummed, and the replacement mala and I weren't getting along, but such things don't even rise to piffle when compared with the subject of the rest of the post, losing home, family, limbs, hope.
Batu -- I know Mongolians were proud of Bush's visit, happy to be in the spotlight for a day, and you should be. You've accomplished so much since 1990 and it's good to have America as a friend. But there is a larger world outside Mongolia. In my country, and in that world, George Bush has simply been the worst president we've ever had. I can't even imagine how long it's going to take to clean up the diplomatic and economic damage he's wrought in his simple-minded incompetence. I just hope the Mongolian peacekeeping soldiers that have gotten pulled into his foolish adventures stay safe.
Posted by: Konchog | July 25, 2006 at 07:28 PM
Have to agree with Konchog. And it's getting worse, fast. Tonight's news was especially bad.
Posted by: lynnela | July 25, 2006 at 07:50 PM
Apparently we talking about the WWIII now, "free world vs islam"... To me, what's really scary is how the electorate is routinely cajoled into voting for someone like Bush. In a nation with the role of policing the world.
Posted by: Mongol dude | July 26, 2006 at 01:56 AM
Konchog, while I don't have to trawl the Internet for news of the war, since it hits me in the face hourly, I still read everything I can. It would be innappropriate to debate who may be wrong on this blog, but I've taken your words to heart. Being in the middle makes equanimity challenging at best.
I guess the best lesson so far is that war is an opportunity to practice.
The Tibetan view seems to be that when you are attacked, run away. Do anything, but do not fight back lest you hurt or kill a sentient being. I am having a hard time integrating that particular lesson, but I do try to be mindful of it at all times. Any words of wisdom on war that you can offer would be much appreciated.
Posted by: Zendette | July 26, 2006 at 12:57 PM
Here's me with one offtopic question, again. I red somwhere in Zanabazar guide that Gengis Khan was considered to be emanation of Vajrapani- protector deity of Mongolia: "By the mid-seventeenth century Chingis had become an accepted figure in the Buddhist pantheon..." Is it the case today? I mean with rebuilding the buddhism has the Chingis found his place again "in the Buddhist pantheon"? Personally I hope he does because even he maybe was not the most pleasent guy to come across fact is that he created Mongol nation and thus the safehaven for tibethan buddhism.
To Zendette: I will not pretend that I'm much in to the buddhist phillosophy because I'm not (that's why we have Konchog) however I must notice that some distorted ideas about buddhism have been most likley created in the West: like those that you stated that buddhist must run from conflict at any cost or even more absurde one that buddhist must be vegetarian etc. Konchog's story about school bully clearly explains that if we stand by and do nothing when innocent people getting hurt we are participating in suffering as well as were the one inflicting them.
Posted by: Vedran | July 26, 2006 at 02:31 PM
Regarding Chinggis Pantheon
Chinggis Khaan as a Buddhist Panteon? ? ? :(
If it is true, Buddhism is not buddhism in Mongolia, just name it only lamaism.
But i doubt. As a Mongolian, i never heard such thing. There are some cases that some people refer to Chinggis khaan as Bogd Ezen Chinggis Khaan which many scholars not happy to use buddhist title "Bogd" for Chinggis Khaan. Hope it is just some language misunderstanding. Lamaism should stop trying to present Mongolian spirituality and lamas should stop messing up with Mongolian Politics
Most recent case was about opening ceremony of Chinggis Khaan Monuments before the naadam.
As for newspaper "Daily news" - Өдрийн сонин stated:- "There were growing concern among historians and scholars that Chinggis Monument opening ceremony might turn out to become buddhist ceremony as it always happened before that politics and lamas go together hand and hand at any celebration or ceremony to win over people's mind. Fortunately, despite obviously buddhist President Enkhbayar's presence, under pressure from well known historians and nationalist populists, Opening ceremony went on without any Buddhist lamas activity. It was pure Mongolian national ceremony representing Mongolian Statehood. "
Actually now it is exactly right time for Mongolian lamaist Buddhist to clean their mess regarding Mongolian politics, history, culture and shamanism. They should pursue real pure form of Buddhism. Otherwise big lamas tend to hang around political parties and its leaders, this kind of involvement might cause suspicion for the entire religion. Last historical lesson like persecution under COmmunism is not forgetten yet.
Buddhism is a one of many religions Mongols practice.
PS:- Zanabazar is not that popular among Mongolians as Buddhist might except. Some consider him as a traitor that brought all Mongols under Manchus.
Posted by: Mongol Ard | July 26, 2006 at 07:34 PM
Zendette -- I thought we'd hear from you (for those who don't know, Z lives in Israel). I can't even pretend to understand the complexity of what you're going through, and the extreme challenge it presents to one's Buddhist practice. But I'll address a couple of things.
The first is that it's not accurate to say the Buddhist position is to run away from all conflict. For example, the Khampas especially tried to defend Tibet from the Chinese invasion. They were just woefully mismatched and overwhelmed, but they did continue CIA-sponsored guerilla warfare until the 70's.
Buddhists try to align their thinking with the actual truth of any given situation. Thus, a Buddhist cultivates as deep a sense as possible of equanimity -- the view that all beings are fundamentally equal, both in the relative and ultimate sense. All have equal rights to happiness and freedom from suffering; all are Buddha in their nature. Then we come to understand that each being at one time or another has served as our kind mother, sacrificing so much for our welfare. Once other beings are seen in this way, one's response to conflict changes. One teacher of mine asked us to think about this: Imagine your own mother suddenly goes crazy and comes lunging at you with a butcher's knife. What would you do? Overpower her and pummel her to death as revenge for her daring to threaten you? Of course not. She's your mother. You would do what you needed to do to subdue and disarm her in the least painful way possible. Then you would begin the process of pacifying the root causes of her inflamed and distorted mind with loving kindness.
This is the most difficult, most courageous path in life, to truly love your enemy. The Dalai Lama reportedly wept inconsolably when Mao died, knowing the suffering that was in store for him due to his horrible karma. He also said Mao was one of his best teachers. It's only through the presence of enemies that one can really generate the sublime qualities of compassion and patience. Speaking of patience, the most perfect and apropos discourse on this may be found in chapter 6 of Shantideva's "Way of the Bodhisattva."
To the others: I have heard the view of Chingghis Khan as an emanation of Vajrapani -- Mongolia is said to be Vajrapani's Buddhafield. I don't know the source, though, so we have to talk about it later. Mongol Ard: relax, bro. The Mongol lamas are still trying to find their way after three generations of brutal, relentless oppression. The situation is far from perfect, but there are jewels among them and many, many hopeful signs if you will open your eyes to look.
Posted by: Konchog | July 26, 2006 at 09:32 PM
To Mongol Ard: I reeeealy hate to disagree with you because you are Mongol and it is your country that we are discusing but you are talkin about communist holocaust of buddhism in Mongolia like it's a historical lesson?! If it's a lesson it's lesson that never again you Mongols should follow foreign propaganda that is offering you instant and quick solutions for your problems. Russian communists said to Mongol communist converts: destroy your tempels, kill your lamas and monks, they are supersticious, they are corrupt, they are parasites, they hold down the entire nation and without them you will flourish and trive into the communist future! Evreyone knows what was that future like for both Russia and Mongolia: gulags, executions, forced relocations of entire nations, forced setellments for nomadic people wich destroyed they culture and trown them into the alcoholism and suicides! I recommend to you Don Croner's book "Zanabazar Guide" page 28. title Burkhan Khaldun Here's another quotation:" According to the Rosary of White Lotuses, an exhaustive history of Buddhism in Mongolia, Chingis, although not a Buddhist himself, was considered an emanation of Vajrapani, one of the protector deities of Mongolia."
Posted by: Vedran | July 27, 2006 at 06:31 AM
to Vedran:- I am an individual, don't present whole Mongolia. I am just expressing my opinion which is based on discussion in the circle of young friends. Feel free to critisize. We all know stories and most favorite scapegoat is communist Russians. Communist or not, Mongolia needed to make some reform. At that time Mongolia was second Tibet. 1911-1951, - Mongolia changed dramatically in everyway. You know what happened to Tibet. Tibetans very too religious, did not use that opportunity of time between 1911-1951 to modernise or seek another protector against China. Our forefathers choice was right. Otherwise we might have been another Tibet
Posted by: Mongol Ard | July 27, 2006 at 08:20 PM
to Blog Owner- Although i am not religious person, I enjoy reading your blog about Mongolia.
Posted by: Mongol Ard | July 27, 2006 at 08:22 PM
Thank you Mongol Ard! Now I see what happend. You see things as they are: what's donne is donne, we can't change history and we must look forvard into the future because thats what we can make better! It's obviously healty way of seeing things but it is rare in my country. Not without a reason it is said that evreyone is fighting for a better future only Croatians are fighting for a better past. I thougt that I was beyonde that but now I see I was under subconscience influence of that kind of thinking!
Posted by: Vedran | July 28, 2006 at 02:08 PM
Thank you Konchog. I will try to work with what you wrote.
Posted by: Zendette | July 30, 2006 at 03:49 PM